could set-up a sphere of influence throughout Latin AmericaII.
U.S. Interventions in Latin America
Though methodologies and purposes are often quite different, political scientists and historians generally consider similar narratives. and use a case-study approach to explain US policy and to connect the Cold War in Latin America to the larger global conflict. Similarly, also tries to contextualize the history of US–Latin American relations to determine how this history fits into the history of US foreign policy. The authors of and seek to determine what long-term trends mark inter-American relationships, and like many other scholars, they seek to build an argument that the United States generally used its power irresponsibly.
U.S. Military Presence in Latin America Increasing – …
Explores how Fidel Castro’s success radicalized Latin American politics, especially in Peru, Chile, and Nicaragua. Based mostly on secondary sources. Text focuses on the emergence of rural and urban political violence. Highlights how the United States and its allies in Latin American military regimes responded to political insurgency.
Summarize Woodrow Wilson’s policy in Latin America, ..
Argues that Brazil was a priority for the Truman and Eisenhower administrations by tracing the narrative of their involvement. Counters, broadly, the notion that the United States was not politically engaged in Latin America in the late 1940s and 1950s. Highlights the deep ties developed between the United States and the Brazilian military.
Russia and Latin America: Geopolitical Posturing or International ..
Haines, Gerald. The Americanization of Brazil: A Study of U.S. Cold War Diplomacy in the Third World, 1945–1954. Wilmington, DE: SR Books, 1989.
disinterest towards Latin America ..
Innovative and well-researched study of private US capital in Latin America with a focus on Brazil. Demonstrates that the US private sector was deeply concerned about Latin American development, and in the case of Rockefeller and Kaiser, hoped to both advance progressive government, local economic growth, and occasionally turn a profit. Effective in explaining that diplomatic (government centered) histories miss much in discussions of global power.