Myth: The war was fought largely by the poor and uneducated.

We believe that the Huey along with the Huey Cobra have more combat flighttime than any other aircraft in the history of warfare assuming you count actualhostile fire exposure versus battle area exposure. As an example, heavybombers during World War II most often flew missions lasting many hours withonly 10 to 20 minutes of that time exposed to hostile fire. Helicopters inVietnam seldom flew above 1,500 feet which is traffic pattern altitude forbombers and were always exposed to hostile fire even in their base camps.

Myth: The fighting in Vietnam was not as intense as in World War II.

Historian Yohuru Williams takes a look back at protests during the Vietnam War.

Myth: The United States lost the war in Vietnam.

development. But it does mean that we need to be on guard for the kind of distortions, misleading statements, and outright lies that characterized this debate from its very start in 2002. As you've heard by now, the Republican Party is currently divided over whether, knowing what we know now, we should ever have launched the war. Most of the Republican presidential candidates are (to my surprise, I'll admit), saying the answer is of course not, while Jeb Bush is saying that he really doesn't want to say, because doing so a "disservice" to the troops (which would only be true if he also thinks the answer is no).

Vietnam War is the most commonly used name in English

I'm not particularly worried that Clinton is gung-ho to start another Middle East war, as some of the Republicans running for president seem to be. But the Iraq War continues to cast a long shadow over American foreign policy. Hillary Clinton got it wrong. We deserve to know as much as we can about why that was, how she thinks about her mistake today, and what kind of effect it would have on her decision-making if she becomes president.

The first combat troops arrived in 1965 and we fought the war until the cease-fire of January 1973.

The Vietnam War: Why That Conflict Produced Iconic ..

As , the idea that the war was a result of "faulty intelligence" is a myth. The fact is that "the intelligence" on Iraq was a multi-faceted thing, and even at the time people understood that the Bush administration was manipulating it to its own ends, pressuring the intelligence community, cherry-picking the most nefarious-sounding bits, and ignoring the weight of evidence that there was no gigantic arsenal of WMD in Iraq, and that Saddam Hussein's government was not in fact in league with al-Qaeda. The administration got the intelligence it demanded, and what's most important to remember now is that plenty of people understood that at the time. While most of the media were beating the drums for war, there were outlets and individual reporters raising doubts about the line the administration was pushing and the specific pieces of evidence they were offering. Supposedly damning pieces of information like the uranium yellowcake from Niger and the aluminum tubes were quickly debunked. There was an active movement protesting the upcoming war. The administration's campaign of fear was so heavy-handed that no observer could doubt that they wanted war at all costs, no matter what the evidence actually said.

‘The Vietnam War’: Past All Reason | The Nation

Republicans would like us all to believe that in 2002 and 2003 everyone was in agreement that Iraq posed a terrifying threat to the United States and if we didn't invade, then they would surely attack us with their fearsome arsenal of weapons of mass destruction. But this is just false. Despite the unstoppable momentum for war, dissent was everywhere at the time.

Thi had established himself as virtual warlord of several provinces in northern South Vietnam.

Infantry weapons of the Vietnam war | Weapons of War

A staffer at Madame Tussaud's in London prepares Chewbacca for the wax museum's new Star Wars exhibit. I can only imagine the amount of conditioner it takes to keep all that hair shiny and manageable.

How did the Vietnam War affect America?

Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction; there is no doubt that he is amassing them to use against our friends, against our allies, and against us," said Dick Cheney in a key speech in August 2002. "We know they have weapons of mass destruction. We know they have active programs. There isn't any debate about it," Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. "This is going to be a two-month war, not an eight-year war," Bill Kristol. And of course, Cheney insisted that "We will, in fact, be greeted as liberators."

BFV: World War 2 mod for Battlefield Vietnam - Mod DB

Republicans often defend their support of the war by saying that many Democrats, including Hillary Clinton, looked at the same intelligence they did and came to the same conclusion. But it's also true, as Greg Sargent , that many of Clinton's colleagues looked at the same intelligence she did and came to a different conclusion. So what did she miss? What did the experience teach her about the way intelligence is produced and used? And what about everything that happened afterward?