A Marxist critic would ask questions along the lines of...

The founding figures of in Britain were the first editors of the journal , launched in 1952. One part of the collective, distinguishing the journal from the majority of academic enterprises, was a small group of writers who belonged to a single generation and shared a common political heritage. They were Marxists, being members or fellow-travellers of the Communist Party of Great Britain. They were young, aged typically in their 20s or early 30s. Such figures as , , and are often said to have invented a new way of historical writing, 'history from below', in which the emphasis was put on radical movements, social classes and the campaigns of the dispossessed. Such were the forces which had made the world. These are often said to have been their first and most distinguished historians.

How can you Apply the Marxist/Determinist Approach?

What other works can the Marxist approach be applied to ?
Photo provided by
Flickr

How does a Marxist approach the study of history?

One further part of this generation's genius lay in a perhaps surprising capacity to build coalitions. On the first Past & Present editorial board, for example, as well the Marxists there were also recognisable Liberals and historical Whigs: including John Morris, the journal's first editor, and , the . Alongside Thompson and Hill, one of the most widely read books of history to be published in this period was 's What is History? (1961). For Carr, in complete contrast to Thompson, history was last of all an interest in the activities of subaltern movements. Rather it was a story of grand contending powers. Carr himself enters the 'Marxist' pantheon primarily as a sympathetic historian of the Soviet Union. A former British diplomat and occasional contributor to The Times, there could have been no history that interested Carr less than history from below. And yet such was the moment that differences of this kind appeared not to matter. All was swept up together. There was a generation – an audience – at work.

What is a Marxist approach to literature? - Quora

Even at the period of their ascendancy, however, the British Marxist historians were a narrowly based set of people. Hilton, Thompson, Hill and Hobsbawm had all been members not just of the Communist Party but also of its historians' group. In the wake of the British invasion of Egypt and the Soviet invasion of Hungary, the Communist Party itself was split. Only Hobsbawm remained a member of the Party after 1956. Thompson became an activist first in the New Left and then in the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). Hilton and Hill were lost to political activity. Thompson admitted to awkwardness, becoming more pronounced over time, 'For one must', he wrote, 'to survive an unassimilated socialist in this infinitely assimilative culture make one's sensibility all knobbly – all knees and elbows of susceptibility and refusal.'() After 1956, there was no new Party to train a comparably talented set of younger historians.

Allright now that we have all heard the song how does the marxist approach apply to it?
Photo provided by
Flickr

The Marxist Approach by Brian Dwyer on Prezi

The British Marxist historians are best known for a series of defining works. Edward Thompson's 1963 book, The Making of the English Working Class, argued for a form of Marxism in which class difference was the product not simply of economic distinctions between people, but of a much broad category of human experience: 'Class happens', Thompson wrote, 'when some men, as a result of common experience (inherited or shared) feel and articulate the identity of their interests as between themselves, and as against other men whose interests are different from (and usually opposed to) theirs.'() Thompson humanised Marxism, breaking it from its link to Russia, making it acceptable to the 1960s young.

Neorealist And Neo Marxist Approaches To Globalisation Politics Essay


-What is the economic status of the characters?
-How does their status effect them?
-What about their status does the author highlight?
-Does the author over look the impact of socioeconomic statuses on his characters?

Marxist Approach - MyAssignmenthelp

This chapter begins with a discussion of Marxism, which is a theory about the meaning of history. According to Marxism the meaning of history is that man's destiny lies in the creation of a Communist society where men will experience a higher stage of being amounting to the realization of true freedom. It then addresses the question of whether there is a Marxist theory of law. General theories of law are predicated on a belief in the nature of law which can be termed legal fetishism. Marxists reject such a belief and it follows that they are not inclined to develop a general theory of law as an end in itself. Nevertheless, much remains for Marxists to say about law.