Oedipus the King Essay Examples & Outline

Dramatic irony is also use by Sophocles to make the audience feel their taken part of the play knowing the fate of the main character, making the audience wait in suspense wanting to know how Oedipus would react to his fate....

and their contributions to the story or the development ..

After being pushed to the limits of his patience by Oedipus, Tiresias finally ..
Photo provided by

S., Wolf, G., & Sophocles., (2004)

Freud, , Lecture XXI, 331. : Freud’s interpretation of Sophocles’s play is a key component of the extraordinary contribution Freud made to how we think about ourselves, but let us note that this interpretation is far from how the mature Oedipus himself interprets his actions.

Oedipus the King Role of Gods Essay - 1084 Words

The fifth alternative is that Oedipus lacked agency not because he was in no state to make use of whatever knowledge he had, but because he lacked knowledge . Specifically, he lacked knowledge of himself, his circumstances and the consequences of his actions. His ignorance deprived him of agency or, if one prefers, of the ability to make beneficial use of such agency as he enjoyed. I am assuming this point is quite clear as regards the killing and the sex. Oedipus did not know who he was in relation to the person he killed or the one he made love to. As regards the self-blinding, I would call attention to Oedipus’s ignorance of the consequences of this action. He understood that he was going to poke his eyes out, but he had little idea what it would mean to be blind—how he would in time become a beggar and how even without eyes he would nonetheless still be able to “see” (perceive) many aspects of his present circumstances and past deeds. (Sophocles hardly ignores this point since the wise man of his piece, Tiresias, is blind.) If you do not know what you are choosing, it is hard to say you are making a choice. (Or in choosing blindness could Oedipus have indeed been thinking that he was choosing Tiresian wisdom?)

Louis Bouwmeester as Oedipus in a Dutch production of Oedipus the King [Oedipus Rex, by Sophocles] ..
Photo provided by

uniondale-ela - Oedipus the King

When I began studying Sophocles’s play, George W. Bush, Richard Cheney, Karl Rove and Donald Rumsfeld were king. From this perspective, Oedipus seemed to have several virtues. Yes, he did not just steal or squeak out an election; he gained power by killing the reigning monarch and taking the monarch’s widow for a wife. But he was capable of seeing the interests of all the Theban people as his own and risked not only his reputation but also his life in efforts intended to promote the citizens’ well-being. Time and again Oedipus showed a capacity that, over the centuries, we Americans have come to esteem as much if not more than any other. Instead of passively accepting his lot, he took vigorous and consequential action to eliminate obstacles and solve problems.

Yet Tiresias accuses Oedipus, “you see and still are blind.” ..

Going back to Hemingway’s novel now, almost 100 years after its publication, one is struck by how trivial and banal the human beings are, and by the evocation of anti-Semitism, of willful prejudice. In comparison to them, Oedipus, Tiresias, the old shepherd and perhaps even Creon and Jocasta are people or characters of much greater depth. But the superficiality of Hemingway’s characters, Robert Cohn excepted, is as integral to his vision as human depth is to Sophocles’s. Would we say, though, that if life is suffering, we would rather suffer as deeply as one of Sophocles’s characters, rather than vapidly?

New Interpretation of Sophocles' oedipus ..