These contributions are known as soft money contributions.

The report, “The New Soft Money,” is based on interviews with former lawmakers, campaign staff and operatives who have worked on independent spending efforts. It was funded by the , founded by the financier George Soros, a major supporter of liberal causes, super PACs and candidates.

These seemingly trifling parts of a campaign cost money.

Soft Money and Politics - Slate Magazine

Soft Money’s Squishy Political Influence - The New York Times

The decision and parties’ campaign committees
The congressional party campaign committees (the DSCC and the NRSC on the Senate side, and the DCCC and NRCC on the House side) focus primarily on raising money for candidate campaigns. Prohibited by law from accepting unlimited soft money contributions, they rely on regulated hard money contributions from members, individuals, and political action committees (PACs). The Citizens United decision did not alter federally regulated contribution limits. The decision, in other words, changed nothing in terms of how the party committees can raise and spend money. It may, however, indirectly change the role they play in candidate campaigns and congressional party politics.

with a ban on so-called “soft money” contributions to political ..

The future: corporations and special interests
Most of the money party committees raise is spent on televised campaign advertising. No one can predict how much money special interests will spend on advertising in the upcoming midterm elections, but the party committees anticipate a spike in competition. As a result, safe incumbents are likely to face increased pressure to raise money for the party and for at-risk-candidates. But these incumbents also may fear for their own safety. What if they are opposed by a corporation willing—and now able—to spend unlimited amounts to secure their defeat? If safe incumbents begin to doubt their own safety, the party committees will likely suffer financially. And the less they are able to help their own candidates, the less power they wield.

There is also the “hard money” in political campaigns, which is strictly regulated by law through the Federal Election Commission.

Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S

However analysts also agreed that Obama exaggerated the likelihood of foreign money flooding into candidate campaigns. The decision did not legalize unlimited political spending by foreign corporations, but it did leave open the question of how to treat U.S. subsidiaries of foreign-controlled corporations.

How Much Has Citizens United Changed the Political …

One of the problems with campaigns today is "soft money." Another problem I believe we should address is, candidates making promises to get elected and then not keeping those promises.

Money's power in politics: Give everyone a share - CNN

The remaining contributions were from PAC and from the category, “Other.” I was surprised to learn that several of the top contributors were Microsoft Corp., Boeing, Dreamworks SKG, Puget Sound Energy, and the MoneyTree....

FREE Soft Money in Political Campaigns Essay

Hard money is the contrast to soft money meaning that it is the contributions made by a person or PAC that gives to a federal campaign or political party for the use in federal elections....

Describe and evaluate the role of money in political campaigns

Soft money can be defined as, unlimited union and corporate donations to political parties that allow special interest power brokers to have their way in Washington....

There are great American political fundraisers

Although it is illegal for corporations and unions to donate directly to political campaigns, it is completely legal for them to hire legal professionals known as lobbyists to represent their interests to politicians holding or running for public office. Lobbyists may also receive contributions from several of their clients, bundle them together, and then donate to a political campaign ­ this process is known as “bundling contributions.”