Internet privacy involves the right or mandate of ..

However, over the ensuing decade it has become clear thatprivacy notices do not materially improve consumers’ privacypractices. The Federal Trade Commission, other agencies,researchers like Lorrie Faith Cranor at Carnegie MellonUniversity’s “CUPS” laboratory, and others are diligently pursuingstrategies to make notices effective at communicating privacyinformation to consumers in the hope that they will act on thatinformation. But none has yet borne fruit.

up to the privacy promises made to consumers

In addition to the generally accepted definition of privacy as "the right to be ..

Your hearing to explore consumer online privacy is ..

It is an error to think that there are discrete “online” and“offline” experiences. Consumers do not have separate privacyinterests for one and the other. Likewise, people do not haveprivacy interests in their roles as consumers, and a separate setof interests as citizens. If the federal government is going towork on privacy protection, the federal government should start bygetting its own privacy house in order.

such as the right to freedom of expression or the right to privacy

Although the FTC has never explicitly stated that partial disclosure triggers full disclosure, it scrutinized statements that "arguably raised an inference of at least one potential use" of personal data in its report to Congress on online privacy.

Legal scholars have also suggested that the expansion of privacy threatens free speech rights protected by the First Amendment.

Do Consumers Have A Right To Opt ..

Of all the online privacy concerns, perhaps the most frettinghas been done about “behavioral advertising” - sometimes referredto as “psychographic profiling” to get us really worked up. What istruly shocking about this problem, though, is that the remedy formost of it is so utterly simple: exercising control over thecookies in one’s browser.

But the net impact of this decision ..

The correct approach is for consumers to be educated about whatthey reveal when they interact online and in business so that theyknow to wear the electronic and commercial equivalents ofclothing.

FCC Votes to Block New Internet Privacy Rule - …

As a thought experiment, imagine taking away Google, Facebook,Apple’s suite of consumer electronics (and the app universe thathas sprung up within it), and the interactivity that AT&Tfacilitates. Consumers would rightly howl at the loss of richnessto their lives, newly darkened by privacy. And we would all beworse off as the economy and society were starved of access toinformation.

Information for Discount Cigarette Consumers

If privacy regulation “blinded” sites and platforms to relevantinformation about their visitors, the advertising-supported modelfor Internet content would likely be degraded. Consumers would beworse off - entombed by an excess of privacy when their preferenceswould be to have more content and more interaction than regulationallows advertising to support.

Privacy, Consumers, and Costs by Robert Gellman - EPIC

Keeping it Simple: What About PrivacyNotice?
If the full suite of “fair information practices” is too intricateand internally inconsistent to produce a flowering of privacyacross the land, perhaps some minimal privacy regulation would movethe ball in the right direction. Mandated privacy notices arewidely regarded as a step that would put consumers in a position toprotect privacy themselves.

It has a profile for every user that has ever looked ..

Again, consumers educated about what they reveal when theyinteract online can make decisions about how to behave that willprotect privacy much better - in all online contexts - thanconsumers unaware of how the world around them works.