This time it was the police pension scheme that came under scrutiny.

Beyond the concerns raised by such conflicts of interest and their attendant threats tothe ombudsperson’s neutrality and independence, there appears at this time to belittle reason for concern in the employment relationships between ombudspersons andstakeholders. The ombudspersons were paid well enough to reasonably assure adequateallocation of time and effort by the ombudspersons, and had access to sufficient supportstaff to be able to accomplish their duties.

__ g. facilitator of general improvements in the carve-out system.

8. If you are an ombudsman on a part-time basis, please describe the rest of yourclient base:
Photo provided by


It should be noted that not all of the ombudspersons had such sanguine feelings towardlawyers as they relate to alternative dispute resolution in carve-outs. Two ombudspersons,including one with a legal background, viewed lawyers as having a decidedly negativeimpact on the carve-outs, either because the lawyers were trying to sign up workers asclients in spite of their knowledge of the carve-outs, or because of legal attacks on thevalidity of the carve-out program as an institution. Another ombudsperson, one with alegal background, said lawyers had neither a positive nor a negative impact on thecarve-out program.

also voted for debates on the issues of public services, pensions, ..

All five of the ombudspersons who answered the question listed "providinginformation" among the most important functions they perform. Three also listedadvocacy or protection of injured workers, three listed facilitating communications amongthe parties, and three listed fact finding or clarification. Functions listed only oncewere: helping the injured worker select and get to a physician, and facilitating generalimprovements to the system.

9. If you are an ombudsman on a full-time basis, is the ombudsman function your onlyresponsibility? If not,
Photo provided by

Overview of Multiemployer Pension System Issues

Worker L filed an injury discrimination grievance because she was laid off uponreturning to work from her injury. She filed for mediation with the help of theombudsperson to recoup lost wages from the time of her layoff. The mediator could notreach an agreement that was satisfactory to both parties and Worker L filed forarbitration. She hired a lawyer who was recommended by her local union. On the day of thearbitration, the law firm sent a different lawyer who was unfamiliar with Worker L’scase. The arbitrator ruled in favor of Contractor A. Worker L has since been rehired byContractor A and has decided not to file with the WCAB.

MYTH: Teachers make just as much as other, comparable professions

While there is concern about any increase in premiums, the current and historical amounts may be perceived as relatively low. The multiemployer premium for 2017 is $28 per participant, which represents an average of approximately Employers may try to demonstrate that lower levels of ERIbenefits for older workers are justified by age-based costconsiderations -- that is, that they are spending equal amounts onbenefits for all of their employees but that those amounts purchaseless for older workers. Because the cost of early retirementbenefits does not generally increase with age, this showing isunlikely to be successful..05 per hour out of employees’ wage packages.

The Crisis in Retirement Planning - Harvard Business Review

Worker N’s case involved complex issues related to a prior injury and medicaltreatment costs. It was resolved at the ombudsperson stage without the filing of agrievance.

the different types available and the relative ..