Changing the electoral college system will not be easy.

68 (attributed to Alexander Hamilton) noting that the members of the Electoral College are bound by the Constitution to meet in their individual states.

The Electoral College Is Bad, Subverting It Now Is Bad …

A second criticism of the electoral college is its winner-take-all character.

U. S. Electoral College: Frequently Asked Questions

For a third party to win the presidency, they would need to have enough electoral votes to prevent a majority to any candidate and have enough support to be elected over the two major party candidates. Because of this, the Electoral College process essentially forces third party voters to merge into one of the two major parties. Likewise, the two major parties, seeking the votes to win the election can mold their platforms to gain the votes of third party movements. The goal is to have two parties representing the centers of their respective platforms. Supporters of this theory suggest that extremists would have more incentive to campaign if the elections were based solely on popular vote, because if runoff elections were required to win the presidency, parties would tend toward more radical platforms to gain more support.

No more Electoral College? Here's how campaigning …

In states with concentrations of ethnic and racial minorities or special interest groups, often being states with high numbers of electoral votes, winning over those groups can swing an election due to the "winner-takes-all" system in the Electoral College. The votes of minority groups can carry more influence than their amount of votes would suggest.

The third objection to the electoral college is the so-called  problem.

The Electoral College is the process through which the President ..

68 that I did not think required quoting, previously, also makes it clear that the aim of the Founders, in keeping the members of the Electoral College confined to their separate states, was to reduce as much as humanly possible "cabal, intrigue, and corruption," described in No.

electoral college list « 70news

And yet, what else can be done? Every four years we we hear calls to replace the Electoral College with plurality popular voting (the worst of all possible alternatives). But nothing happens. Nor will it soon, because one party — the Republican — benefits from the status quo.

Posts about electoral college list written by 70news

So is the situation hopeless? Not really. It turns out that the Electoral College, per se, is not what distorts the system so badly. It is the winner-takes-all method of allocating each state's electors.

This section links to a Google news search for the term U.S. + Electoral + College

Why We Use Electoral College, Not Popular Vote

Even more bitter are recent memories of 2000, when Al Gore was the clear plurality winner, garnering substantially more votes from American citizens, yet lost the White House by one elector, because four states swung toward his opponent in squeaker tie-finishes.[A bitterness exacerbated by the 2016 election results.]

The Troubling Reason the Electoral College Exists - TIME

What actually caused the ructions of 2000? Despite all the attention paid to "hanging chads" and questionable or biased election management in Florida, these were not key reasons for such a profound imbalance between the popular and Electoral College tallies. Far more telling was the effect of Ralph Nader's insurgent third party candidacy, drawing off more than enough votes from the left wing to deny Al Gore victory in several states. George W. Bush is unlikely to have been the Naderites' second choice. Yet, such is the system.

Repeal The Electoral College | Richard T. Reilly

The Electoral College is the process through which the is elected to office. The process was formed as a compromise between allowing either the or popular vote to determine the outcome of presidential elections. Each state receives a number of votes equal to the total number of their delegation to the . The vote casters, known as electors, are chosen by rules differing in each state, but many are elected during each party's state conventions. All states other than Maine and Nebraska give all the state's votes to the winner of the popular vote in their state. The winners in and receive two votes - representing the state's - while the remaining votes can be split between candidates.