Opinion | The Affirmative Action War Goes On

Robert Fullinwider and Judith Lichtenberg, in their 2004 book,Leveling the Playing Field: Justice, Politics, and CollegeAdmissions, present an integration argument for affirmativeaction centered around the little syllogism above (Fullinwider andLichtenberg 2004, 165–188). A state like Michigan has strong reasonsfor wanting its leaders of commercial, financial, legal, cultural, andeducational institutions to reflect to some practical degree theracial and ethnic variety of its population. One of the reasons isoffered by Justice O'Connor: the very legitimacy of state institutionscomes under a cloud if important segments of the population—longexcluded from participating at the highest levels—remain on theoutside looking in. Another reason is emphasized by ElizabethAnderson: democratic governance draws nurture from inclusion ratherthan exclusion. If the leaders who frame the political agenda andshape public opinion remain uniformly white, the common good getsshortchanged; it isn't really common. Finally, racial and ethniccomity are harder to achieve when whites see a black or brown face ina position of leadership or power as a novelty rather than a commonplace.[] Thus, if states like Michigan have strong reasons for creating anintegrated stratum of leaders, they have strong reasons for makingsure that the universities that feed this stratum are themselvesintegrated.

Affirmative Action, Public Opinion, And Federalism | …

I agree that affirmative action made it possible for my resume to be reviewed, ..

Opinion: The future of affirmative action

King -- who launched Operation Breadbasket in 12 American cities -- supported affirmative action because he never confused the dream with American reality.

Justices voice support for state affirmative action ban

Thus, preferential affirmative action in the workplace served thesame rationale as the non-preferential sort. Its purpose wasnot to compensate for past wrongs, offset unfair advantage,appropriately reward the deserving, or yield a varietyof social goods; its purpose was to change institutions so they couldcomply with the nondiscrimination mandate of the Civil Rights Act.

Affirmative action is a highly controversial issue in the United States today, it has many supporters and it also has many detractors.
This pressure can even trigger people to support issues that are politically correct, such as affirmative action.

*FREE* shipping on qualifying offers

Diversity is many things insisted Powell; it cannot be reduced to onething. But why not? This question—and Justice O'Connor'sacquiescence in the Law School's way of framing its affirmative actiongoal—spotlights a crucial gap in Powell's Bakkeopinion. Diversity is many things—so many things, infact, that institutions will think it worthwhile to concentrate onsome diversity factors rather than others. One college may emphasizeadmitting foreign students; another may make its mission to educatepoor students; a third may specialize in getting science students whohave shown unusual promise in high school. If colleges have a legallyprotected interest in choosing a diverse student body, why don't theyhave a legally protected interest in deciding which part of thediversity spectrum to single out for special attention? If they cansingle out a part of the spectrum, why can't they use a simple devicelike set-asides to effect their purpose?

going to South Africa was more than just about revising my position on affirmative action.

Where did affirmative action come from? - Business Insider

Our school textbook defines affirmative action as “a program established that attempts to improve the chances of minority applicants for educational or employment purposes, although they may have the same qualifications, by giving them leverage so that they can attain a level that is equal to caucasian applicants” (Berman 522).

Jan 21, 2012 · Justice Anthony Kennedy, while no fan of affirmative action, has in past decisions supported some use of race in certain situations

Students, parents, and faculty are excited

Affirmative action in theory and in thought is intended to promote the welfare of this country’s minorities by supporting the idea that individuals are equal and should not be judged by race or sex.