Explain and evaluate the exten essays

Published on 1st November 2010, this is an international standard which is by definition for voluntary application and which gives the main guidelines concerning social responsibility with regard to sustainable development. This is the first big step towards CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), and it proposes a method for its adaptation and implementation in an organization. It provides an international behavioural framework for any type of organization (companies, communities, NGOs, unions, etc.) irrespective of size or field of activity.
The ISO 26000 standard observes the major international founding texts, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the articles of the International Labour Organisation, etc. It clarifies, explains, gives additional information, and prevents misunderstandings or arbitrary situations. It was drawn up by consensus, which means that it cannot favour the interests of a limited group of players; on the contrary, it favours the greatest possible number of players.
The ISO 26000 standard is thus a common international tool for any player wishing to build ‘responsible’ legitimacy. It invites organisations to express their approach according to seven central questions in order to define the scope of their responsibility to society: the governance of the organisation, human rights, working relationships and conditions, the , best business practice, questions concerning consumers and the societal commitment. These central questions aim to identify the relevant areas of action the organisation will be able to focus on to set its priorities and implement its own actions.

Quillan antiaircraft step down at his opponent's whereabouts

Herschel summer sank his unchurch very mercurially
Photo provided by
Flickr

Evaluate the effectiveness of speech, ..

Current theories of globalization are primarily macro-sociologicaland focus primarily on globalization as imposing constraints ondemocratic institutions. While not denying that globalization is such afact, its explanations can become more critical and practical by alsoshowing how globalizing processes open up new institutionalpossibilities and new forms of publicity (Bohman 2003). In order totest these possibilities, this theory must make itself a more open andmultiperspectival practice; it must become a global critical theory. Itis in this context that we can press the questions of the normativeadequacy of the democratic ideal that has been inherited from modernliberalism. Indeed, many critical theorists who defend a“cosmopolitan” conception of democracy have a surprisinglystandard conception of how democracy is best organized discursively anddeliberatively. For this reason, they have not asked the questionwhether such practices are able to sustain a sufficiently robust andcooperative form of inquiry under the new global circumstances ofpolitical interdependence.

Evaluate the effectiveness of speech, language and ..

The standard ideas of ideology critique exhibit the problems with asolely third-person model of criticism dependent on some idea of thetheorists being able to discern the “real interests” ofparticipants (Geuss 1981). Rather than claiming objectivity in atransperspectival sense, most practically oriented Critical Theoristshave always insisted that their form of social inquiry takes a“dual perspective” (Habermas 1996, chapter 1; Bohman 1991,chapter 4). This dual perspective has been expressed in many differentways. Critical Theorists have always insisted that critical approacheshave dual methods and aims: they are both explanatory and normative atthe same time, adequate both as empirical descriptions of the socialcontext and as practical proposals for social change. This dualperspective has been consistently maintained by Critical Theorists intheir debates about social scientific knowledge, whether it is withregard to the positivism dispute, universal hermeneutics, or micro- ormacro-sociological explanations.

The principal areas of subsidence of the continental crust are wide intracontinental basins and passive continental margins. In many intracontinental basins crustal extension amounts to only a few percent and is unable to explain their subsidence, as shown for the Timan-Pechora, Pre-Caspian and West Texas basins.
Photo provided by
Flickr

Internal & External Analysis By Erica Olsen

This theory of ideology as distorted communication opens up thepossibility of a different relation of theoretical and practicalknowledge than Habermas has suggested so far. His approach uses formalpragmatics philosophically to reflect upon norms and practices that arealready explicit in justifications in various sorts of argumentation orsecond-order communication. Such reflection has genuine practicalsignificance in yielding explicit rules governing discursivecommunication (such as rules of argumentation), which in turn can beused for the purpose of designing and reforming deliberative anddiscursive institutions (Habermas 1996, 230). It is easily overlookedthat such rules are only part of the story; they make explicit andinstitutionalize norms that are already operative in correct languageuse. Such implicit norms of well-formed and communicatively successfulutterances are not identical with the explicit rules ofargumentation.

Psycholinguistics/Theories and Models of ..

Another way in which this point about democratic legitimacy can bemade is to distinguish the various uses to which practical reason maybe put in various forms of discourse. Contrary to the account oflegitimacy offered in Legitimation Crisis, Habermas laterexplicitly abandons the analogy between the justification of moralnorms and democratic decision-making. Moral discourses are clearlyrestricted to questions of justice that can be settled impartiallythrough a procedure of universalization (Habermas 1990, 43ff). Themoral point of view abstracts from the particular identities ofpersons, including their political identities, and encompasses anideally universal audience of all humanity. Although politics and lawinclude moral concerns within their scope, such as issues of basichuman rights, the scope of justification in such practices can berestricted to the specific community of associated citizens and thusmay appeal to culturally specific values shared by theparticipants.

Start studying CHAPTDER 16 REVIEW ..

Not only does the idea of a comprehensive theory presuppose that thereis one preferred mode of critical explanation, it also presupposesthat there is one preferred goal of social criticism, a socialistsociety that fulfills the norm of human emancipation. Only with such agoal in the background does the two-step process of employinghistorical materialism to establish an epistemically and normativelyindependent stance make sense. The validity of social criticism doesnot merely depend on its being accepted or rejected by those to whomit is addressed. Pluralistic inquiry suggests a different norm ofcorrectness: that criticism must be verified by those participating inthe practice and that this demand for practical verification is partof the process of inquiry itself.