Over the Years Opinions So in conclusion...

Secular opponents argue that whatever rights we have are limited by our obligations. The decision to die by euthanasia will affect other people - our family and friends, and healthcare professionals - and we must balance the consequences for them (guilt, grief, anger) against our rights.

The American Medical Association opposes euthanasia.

the catholic church does not accept that people have a right to die....

Euthanasia over the Years by Shamima Begum on Prezi

Even amongst Roman Catholics, more people support euthanasia than oppose (a poll in Scotland showed over 50% support), in spite of the church's opposition" (Religion and the Right to Die 1)....

Over the Years Opinions So in conclusion..

At the state level, the value conflict can be illustrated byexamining utilitarianism and rights theory. Rights theory contendsthat the state has a limited right to intrude on the affairs ofthe individual. Only in the face of a compelling state interestdoes the state have the right to limit individual rights to privacyand self-determination. In most cases, there is no compellingstate interest when an individual decides to die. A compellingstate interest can only exist if there is a significant threatto society, or the interest of a third party at stake. Whetherthese interests exist in most cases of euthanasia is open to debate.

These and many other questions are asked when the controversial topic of euthanasia is discussed.


As more countries grapple with whether to legalize assisted dying, Thienpont argues they needn’t worry about setting limits on who should be eligible for euthanasia, because only the truly desperate will ask to die.

Please be patient while it loads

Opponents of euthanasia may disagree, and argue that allowing euthanasia will greatly increase the risk of people who want to live being killed. The danger of violating the right to life is so great that we should ban euthanasia even if it means violating the right to die.

By: Shamima A Begum Also known as 'mercy killing' Fun Fact

De Schutter had already picked the day of her suicide, but one month before her intended death last year, her euthanasia request was accepted. Once she had been given clearance to legally die at home, she was relieved she wouldn’t have to kill herself. That was comforting enough to her that she didn’t set an immediate date for her euthanasia and has even drawn up a list of things she’d like to do in the meantime.

continue to change and develop over the years

Those in favour of euthanasia will argue that respect for this right not to be killed is sufficient to protect against misuse of euthanasia, as any doctor who kills a patient who doesn't want to die has violated that person's rights.

How 20 years has changed the debate over assisted ..

Perhaps the main reason that death has changed in western culturehas to do with advances in medicine and technology. Many of thediseases that have historically killed people are now no longera threat to most individuals. Medicine has made a variety of advancesin the treatment of diseases such as smallpox, tuberculosis, malaria,pneumonia, polio, influenza, and measles. People now rarely dieof such traditional causes. Life expectancy has risen to almost75 years in the United States.

Welcome to Exit (the Scottish Voluntary Euthanasia Society)

In the Netherlands, euthanasia and were formally legalized in 2001 after about 30 years of public debate . Since the 1980s, guidelines and procedures for performing and controlling euthanasia have been developed and adapted several times by the Royal Dutch Medical Association in collaboration with that country’s judicial system. Despite opposition, including that from the Belgian Medical Association, Belgium legalized euthanasia in 2002 after about 3 years of public discourse that included government commissions. The law was guided by the Netherlands and Oregon experiences, and the public was assured that any defects in the Dutch law would be addressed in the Belgian law. Luxembourg legalized euthanasia and in 2009. Switzerland is an exception, in that assisted suicide, although not formally legalized, is tolerated as a result of a loophole in a law dating back to the early 1900s that decriminalizes suicide. Euthanasia, however, is illegal . A person committing suicide may do so with assistance as long as the assistant has no selfish motives and does not stand to gain personally from the death. Unlike other jurisdictions that require euthanasia or assisted suicide to be performed only by physicians, Switzerland allows non-physicians to assist suicide.